tiamatlady: (Default)
[personal profile] tiamatlady
This article, which I cannot find reference to in any announcements

Which effectively says "We'll ban first and maybe ask questions later"

Very glad I didn't buy a permanent account and am possibly not rebuying a paid account either. Dunno if I can live without the perks I like, we'll see.

Considering actually heading to the office, in order to get some AC cooling. But I haven't touched my room in a week and my closet is crying out for organization. Plus some useful hair stuff is still buried. Laundry needs a-doin, and cleaning needs to happen.

So maybe more later. I'm waiting for some people to get home and poke me for a chat.

Date: 2007-07-22 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emarkienna.livejournal.com
They posted about it in [livejournal.com profile] lj_biz (though yeah, once this is officially decided about, you'd think they'd announce it in [livejournal.com profile] news).

They're trying to claim they're only banning material that would be illegal - but what they actually mean is "might be illegal", under obscenity laws - and for fiction about under-18s, they're using an excessively paranoid and broad interpretation, and banning material even if it's very unlikely that it would be ruled obscene. Yet confusingly for obscene material depicting adults, they've said they don't care!

It's amazing if they didn't think this might cause a problem, given that it was this (the idea that fiction involving sex and under-18s is illegal) that caused the uproar in the first place.

Date: 2007-07-22 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] developer.livejournal.com
From the posts I've read, they have no intention of ever discussing the policy in news again -- it is over in lj_biz to hide it imnsho. And what is posted seems to be how they are operating.

This, combined with a number of other factors, makes me think there are lots of business things happening behinds the scenes -- whether it be VC, sales, public offering or a splitting up of holdings. I still can't imagine why 6A has both lj and vox beyond that Vox was in development before they bought lj and they were incapable of making the painful decision to deep 6 a product they had a team working on when they decided it made more sense to something to fill that market niche.

A quick peek at the current about us/c-levels implies we have a business team in charge, not the original group of blog enthusiast that even 6A was, let alone lj.

Profile

tiamatlady: (Default)
Tiamatlady

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 04:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios